Taylor v. Bunnell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PULLEN, P. J.—
This case has been reviewed once by the District Court of Appeal (77 Cal. App. 525 [247 Pac. 240, 244]) and once by the Supreme Court (211 Cal. 606 [296 Pac. 288]), the law has been established, and the facts pre sented during the present trial being substantially the same as were adduced at the prior hearings, need not -be again set forth in detail. Briefly, however, this is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered in an action seeking to have a constructive trust impressed upon certain real property.
There is no dispute as to the fact that appellant Edwin Bunnell and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Taylor v. BunnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Morris v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Taylor v. BunnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Bedford v. Pacific Structural Welding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Wynne v. Boone Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Herrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Takehara v. Dulles, Secretary of State of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Takehara v. Dulles, Secretary of State of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.