Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Bunnell

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1933No. Docket No. 4874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, P. J.—

This case has been reviewed once by the District Court of Appeal (77 Cal. App. 525 [247 Pac. 240, 244]) and once by the Supreme Court (211 Cal. 606 [296 Pac. 288]), the law has been established, and the facts pre sented during the present trial being substantially the same as were adduced at the prior hearings, need not -be again set forth in detail. Briefly, however, this is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered in an action seeking to have a constructive trust impressed upon certain real property.

There is no dispute as to the fact that appellant Edwin Bunnell and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Taylor v. BunnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Morris v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Taylor v. BunnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Bedford v. Pacific Structural Welding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wynne v. Boone Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. Herrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Takehara v. Dulles, Secretary of State of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Takehara v. Dulles, Secretary of State of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API