Legal Opinion · Dissent

Takehara v. Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1953No. 13555Published

1Dissent

BONE, Circuit Judge.

I dissent from the views expressed by my associates and for reasons hereafter stated I would affirm the judgment on appeal. Furthermore, I see nothing in the doctrine of the Mandoli case relied on by the majority which requires a reversal.

Appellant voted in a Japanese political election held in 1947 after he was 21 years of age (see Miranda v. Clark, 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 257) and from the record and the inferences which might legitimately be drawn from the testimony of appellant1 I am fully *563persuaded that the findings of the lower court are not clearly erroneous. Argument is…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Helvering v. National Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Reagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Savorgnan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API