Platt v. Okamoto

The appellant asked for a reversal of a judgment rendered for damages to the automobile of plaintiff, caused by a collision with the rear end of the truck of the appellant, on three grounds:

First. That the evidence was insufficient to show that any negligence on the part of the defendant was the proximate cause of the accident in question, but that, on the contrary, the testimony of plaintiff, by which he is bound, conclusively proved that there was no causal relation between the negligence of defendant and the collision.

Second. That the testimony of plaintiff and his own witness conclusively…