Legal Opinion

Dakota Cheese, Inc. v. Taylor

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1995No. 18660PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.

Dakota Cheese Inc., (Dakota Cheese) and James Dee (Dee) appeal the lower court’s dismissal of their case for failure to prosecute. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1985, Dakota Cheese and Dee employed James D. Taylor, E. Steeves Smith, E. Steeves Smith, P.C. and Tinan, Padrnos, Smith and Taylor, a Partnership (Smith and Taylor) to represent them in an audit by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The audit was commenced to determine whether Dakota Cheese and Dee were using calcium caseinate in their cheese making process in violation of USDA…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dacy v. GorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. F. M. Slagle & Co. v. BushnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Root v. BinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Opp v. NieuwsmaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Marilyn M. Marshall v. Mikel WarwickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. Bland v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Reuben C. Setliff, III, M.D., P.C. v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Jurgensen v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API