Legal Opinion

Bond v. Welcome

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1895No. Nos. 9323—(240)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Yellow Medicine county, Powers, J., referring the case to a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

The plaintiff appeals from an order made by the-court below referring, against his objections, all the issues of the case to a referee, to hear, try, and report a judgment.

1. If this is an action at law for the recovery of money only, the-plaintiff is entitled absolutely to a trial by jury, although it involves the examination of a long account on either side, for the *44constitution guaranties to him this right. St. Paul & S. C. U. Co. v. Gardner, 19 Minn. 99 (132). But if the action is equitable in its nature, which, in a jurisdiction where law and equity are administered in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fair v. Stickney Farm Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. SodergrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Rockwell v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Landgraf v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API