Legal Opinion
Petshow v. Farm Bureau Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 4, 1985No. 80-08903 & 81-00263; CA A33571PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying his request for an additional award of attorney fees against Farm Bureau Insurance Co. We affirm.
This case is before us for the second time. The facts are set forth in our previous opinion, Petshow v. Ptld. Bottling Co., 62 Or App 614, 616-17, 661 P2d 1369 (1983), rev den 296 Or 350 (1984):
“Claimant injured his left hand on September 7, 1976, while working for Portland Bottling Company. [Liberty Mutual Insurance Company], the insurer, accepted the claim. In October, 1977, medical treatment involved the removal of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Bentley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Forney v. Western States PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Compensation of Hanna v. McGrew Bros. Sawmill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Brown v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. PhippsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Stovall v. Sally Salmon SeafoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Anfora v. Liberty CommunicationsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Cascade Corporation v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.