Legal Opinion

Vijan v. Vijan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991No. 87-12515, 88-03052; CA A63115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Ray Schulten’s Ford (Schulten’s) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that it, and not Care Unit, Physicians and Surgeons Hospital (Care Unit), is responsible for claimant’s left ankle condition and awarding attorney fees to claimant for having succeeded in establishing that Schulten’s is the responsible employer. We affirm on the question of responsibility and write only to address the question of attorney fees.

Claimant developed a compensable asthma condition while working for Schulten’s. Subsequently, while working for Care Unit as a kitchen helper, he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dilworth v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Howard v. Willamette PoultryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Kathleen Climer & Kinney Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API