State ex rel. Paraskevopoulos v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
For the most part, the parties do not dispute claimant’s medical ability to perform sustained remunerative employment. While claimant does assert that the commission abused its discretion in failing to expressly factor pain into its medical analysis, his argument is negated by State ex rel. Unger v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 672, 640 N.E.2d 833, which held that the factor of pain was sufficiently considered when the complaints about the pain were acknowledged in the medical evidence on which the commission relied. Because the relied-upon evidence made such an acknowledgment in this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Fultz v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Bowling v. National Can Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Shields v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Stevens v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State ex rel. Rocktenn Co. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Department of Transportation v. Indus. Comm., 08ap-303 (2-17-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State ex rel. Paraskevopoulos v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Bray v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (6-5-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.