Legal Opinion

Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1938No. 11019PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

This is an action at law for the recovery of damages for alleged acts of negligence. Appellant was plaintiff below, and appellees were defendants. Counsel for appellant in their brief, in referring to the parties, say: “The plaintiff and the plaintiff’s four assignors will all be referred to herein by the use of the word ‘plaintiff.’ The defendant, Reconstruction Finance Corporation, will be designated and referred to herein as ‘RFC’ and the Regional Agricultural Credit Corporation will be designated herein as the ‘Regional,’ ” Counsel for the respective appellees have…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. StrangSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Langer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Danforth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Union Nat. Bank v. McDonaldDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API