Legal Opinion

Alley v. Peeso

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1930No. 6,592PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

This action, by agreement, was tried to tbe court without a jury. Tbe court adjudged that each party take nothing by tbe action, and that defendant recover from plaintiff bis costs. From tbe judgment, defendant appealed.

Tbe complaint consists of two causes of action, tbe first for money loaned, and tbe second for tbe purchase price of 4,500 shares of stock of tbe Zonolite Company, a Montana corporation, alleged to have been sold by plaintiff to defendant.

The answer of the defendant consists of (1) a general denial, (2) a cross-complaint in which it is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Hyer v. Richmond Traction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Wait v. Kern River Mining, Milling, & Developing Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Frue v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  5. Gilna v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Stewart v. SchnepfArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Flynn v. Helena Cab & Bus Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Torelle v. TemplemanMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Rachou v. McQuittyMontana Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API