Legal Opinion

Torelle v. Templeman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1933No. 7,016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

The plaintiff brought this action seeking specific performance of an accepted option contract.

On April 8, 1930, defendant W. O. Templeman and one Baggs executed and delivered to plaintiff the following agreement:

“Troy, Montana, April 8, 1930.
“For and in consideration of your services and expense incidental to this under! aking, we, the undersigned, agree and hereby undertake to deliver good and sufficient title, free and clear of all encumbrances, in and to the Tungsten King, Buckskin, Sun Fraction, Windy Pass Fraction and the Wind Jammer mining claims, located as being within section 12,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ide v. LeiserMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Horgan v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Ross v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amann v. FrederickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Silliman v. ChrismanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Board of County Commissioners v. BruceMontana Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API