Lindstrom v. Haglund
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
These are appeals from orders of the superior court sitting in probate confirming a sale of real property by a special administrator with general powers, allowing a creditor’s claim, and admitting a will to probate and disallowing a prior will.
Etta Kennedy departed this life on October 25, 1946, leaving two writings purporting to be wills. The first, dated January 24, 1945, devised certain real property to appellant Haglund, the residue to appellant Friday who was named executor. The document dated May 23, 1945, devised the same realty to others and by a codicil thereto dated October 3, 1946,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reed v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Burritt v. Santa Barbara Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Gracey v. City of MercedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Baldwin v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Estate of DuraindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Florence Palting Hair Priscilla Palting Ragland Portia Palting Seely Jeannie Palting Wimett Estate of Mildred Palting v. Marciano v. PangilinanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In re the Accounting of LiebschutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955