Legal Opinion

Motors Insurance Corporation v. Turner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 24, 1957No. 36725PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

The record contains 101 pages of evidence, including documentary evidence. We see no good purpose in detailing it here. Suffice it to say that there is sufficient evidence to show that the plaintiff used the required care, under the circumstances involved, to protect the property. We note the ruling in Insurance Co. of North America v. Leader, 121 Ga. 260 (48 S. E. 972). There was nothing indicated in the case at bar to show that the plaintiff did not use the measure of care required. The jury thought he did, as shown by the verdict. The facts in the case cited immediately hereinabove are…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pearl Assurance Co. Ltd. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Insurance Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Southern Insurance v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. ParnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Pike v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Employers' Fire Insurance v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Motors Insurance Corporation v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Mrs. Bessie JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Pennsylvania Threshermans & Farmers Mutual Insurance Companies v. McCallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API