Legal Opinion

House v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1942No. 8,242PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Claimant received an industrial injury while in appellant's employ. He filed his claim with the Industrial Accident Board. After a hearing the claim was allowed and compensation of $21 a week was awarded which was determined by multiplying the daily wage by six, but reciting that claimant was only employed five days per week. Petition for rehearing was denied and appeal taken to the district court of Silver Bow county. The court sustained the action of the board. From that judgment this appeal was taken.

The specifications of error raise, first, the question whether[1, 2] or not the record…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State Ex Rel. Public Service Commission v. BrannonMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Kerns v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Miller Insurance Agency v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State Board of Land Com'rs v. RirieUtah Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mahlum v. BroederMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Graham v. Tree Farmers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Stokes v. Delaney & Sons, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gaffney v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Hutchison v. General Host Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API