Spence v. Fisher
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in two actions which, by stipulation of the parties, were treated and tried as one action in the superior court. The plaintiffs are husband and wife, and the actions were for the recovery of damages for personal injuries occasioned by a collision between a horse-drawn vehicle in which the plaintiffs were proceeding along a public street in the city of Redlands and an automobile owned by defendant, which was being driven along said street by one Natalia Fisher, an adult daughter of defendant.
It was alleged and found that-the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Griffin v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Hays v. HoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Parker v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Buelke v. LevenstadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Myers v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Rocca v. SteinmetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.