Legal Opinion

City of Lewiston v. Knieriem

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1984No. 13792PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Appeal is taken from a district court judgment denying a mandatory injunction which would have required the removal of a mobile home from a parcel of real property. On the basis of the record before us, we reverse.

The parties filed a stipulation of facts prior to trial which establishes that on or about April 1, 1977, defendant respondents, Walter and Beverly Knieriem, placed a mobile home to be used as their permanent residence on a parcel of property owned by them and located within the City of Lewiston. The parcel is located in an area zoned F-l, a farm zone in which single…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Brookside Village v. ComeauTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital Building Corp. v. HamillIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robert A. Spence, Margaret A. Spence v. Walter R. Zimmerman, Katherine B. Zimmerman, City of Clearwater, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Thomas v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Sprenger, Grubb & Associates, Inc. v. City of HaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API