Legal Opinion

City of Brookside Village v. Comeau

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1982No. C-431PublishedCited by 181 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

This is a suit for permanent injunction, brought by Homer N. Comeau and Hazel A. Comeau, to enjoin the City of Brookside Village from enforcing two ordinances relating to the location of mobile homes and to recover damages. The trial court, without a jury, held the ordinances were valid and constitutional and rendered a take nothing judgment against the Comeaus. The court of civil appeals affirmed the portion of the judgment ordering that the Co-meaus take nothing by their suit but reversed and rendered the judgment of the trial court on the issue of the validity of the city’s…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by181 opinions

  1. Quick v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dallas Merchant's & Concessionaire's Ass'n v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Texas Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. NederlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. N W Enterprises Inc v. The City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API