Demby v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, C.J.
Forty-two years ago, the Supreme Court established in United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973), a bright-line rule authorizing police to search any object found within the temporal and spatial scope of a search incident to a lawful arrest. Last year, in Riley v. California, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014), the Court held that this exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment does not include the search of cell phone data found during an otherwise lawful search incident to arrest. We are called upon in this case to decide…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Geoffrey Narcisco Rivera v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
- Moats v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021