Legal Opinion

Hiett v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 5, 1955No. 32-52PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge

The plaintiff in his petition filed January 21,1952, alleged that he was released from active duty as a Reserve Officer in the Army on January 18, 1947, without retired pay; that by a decision of the Army Disability Review Board, of September 28, 1951, that plaintiff had been permanently disabled as an incident of his service in the Army, which decision was approved by the Secretary of the Army, he was given retired pay beginning on October 1, 1951; that due to a ruling of the Comptroller General contrary to the decisions of this court he was not given retired pay for the period January 18,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  2. Womer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  3. Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. George W. Sohm v. Henry H. Fowler, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  3. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Gant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Hazan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API