Legal Opinion

State v. Fahey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1979No. 12343PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a DWI case. It is before us on appeal regarding the propriety of the circuit judge receiving into evidence the results of James Fahey’s breathalyzer test. The blood alcohol was 0.22%. The trial court denied a motion to suppress. We are convinced that Fahey’s contention that the trial court erred is without merit.

Fahey consented to a breathalyzer test after his arrest for DWI on May 5, 1977. Two preliminary hearings were held herein. The first was held on May 20,1977, before a law-trained magistrate. The law-trained magistrate granted Fahey’s motion to dismiss. The second was held on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. HeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Holland v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. EatonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. State v. OakieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  5. State v. JaegerUtah Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API