Legal Opinion
May v. Women's Bank, N.A.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 25, 1991No. 89SC449PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum
In May v. The Women’s Bank, No. 87CA1852 (Colo.App. June 1, 1989) (not selected for official publication), the Court of Appeals held that by executing an unconditional guaranty petitioner Virginia May waived the right provided by section 4-9-504(3) of the Colorado Uniform Commercial Code (the Code) to challenge the disposition of collateral by respondent The Women’s Bank (the Bank) on the ground that the Bank failed to dispose of the property in a commercially reasonable manner. Having granted May’s petition for certiorari to review that conclusion, we reverse and remand with directions.
I
In…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- United States v. Duane G. Willis and Mary J. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. LototskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- First National Park Bank v. Snellen M. Johnson and Ven SavageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Silverberg v. ColantunoColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Topical Jewelers, Inc. v. Nationsbank, NaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- AAR Aircraft & Engine Group, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Security State Bank v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- McFarland v. BrierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.