Legal Opinion

Konrad v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 13, 1992No. 23629PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of both respondents. The issue is whether the trial court erred in applying the three-year federal maritime statute of limitations to injuries arising from the collision of a mast of a sailboat and a transmission line on navigable waters. We hold that federal maritime law applies, and we therefore affirm.

FACTS

On May 27, 1984, Wolfgang Konrad (“Konrad”) was a passenger on a 23-foot sailboat owned by the decedent, George F. Carnes. This sailboat was proceeding in a westerly direction on a saltwater tidal river near…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Butler v. American Trawler Co., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1989
  5. Godfrey v. Little River Fishing Fleet, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Diamond M-Odeco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. LaSusa v. Lake Michigan Trans-Lake Shortcut, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  3. Bourgeois v. Weber Marine, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2015
  4. Voge v. SchnaidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bell v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API