Legal Opinion
KSD, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 11, 2006No. 05-1229CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
This is a pre-award bid protest ease in which the plaintiff, KSD, Inc. (KSD), claims that the United States Army failed to follow required and appropriate proceedings, including the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA), 41 U.S.C. § 253 et seq. (2000), when it awarded a sole source contract to the defendant-intervenor, the McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company (MDHC), a subsidiary of the Boeing Corporation. The plaintiff filed motions for preliminary and permanent injunction and a motion for judgment upon the administrative record. The plaintiff alleges that the Army…
2Cases cited163 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Textron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Heritage of America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Defense Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Infrastructure Defense Technologies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.