Legal Opinion
Infrastructure Defense Technologies, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 7, 2008No. Nos. 07-582 C, 07-695 CPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER1
ME ROW, Senior Judge.
In this pre-award procurement protest, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1), the protestor, Infrastructure Defense Technologies, LLC (hereinafter “IDT”), seeks in-junctive and declaratory relief to preclude the Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”) from awarding a follow-on sole source Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) contract for collapsible force protection (“Con-certainer”) units to Hesco Bastion, Ltd. (“Hesco”).
Hesco has intervened in this action. Pursuant to RCFC 52.1, motions have been filed, by all parties, for judgment on the…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Digitalis Education Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Science Applications International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.