Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 25, 1989No. 63,428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brazil, J.:

The First National Bank of Manhattan, Kansas, (First Bank) appeals from a Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) order finding First Bank must pay a privilege tax based only on First Bank’s taxable income and that First Bank and First Manhattan Bancorporation (Bancorp), a holding company which owns a majority of First Bank’s stock, may not file a consolidated tax return for purposes of determining Kansas income tax liability. First Bank also appeals the BOTA’s finding that Bancorp and First Bank may not be treated as a unitary business for tax purposes. We affirm.

First Bank is a nationally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. FW Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Dept. of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Armold, Director of TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Pioneer Container Corp. v. BeshearsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. In Re the Appeal of News Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal of A. M. Castle & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. In re the Appeal of Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. In re the Appeal of Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API