Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Appeal of Federal Deposit Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1991No. 66,097Published

1DissentSix, J.

K.S.A. 79-1106 (Ensley 1984) and K.S.A. 79-1107 (Ensley 1984) signal the legislative intention of taxing a bank’s privilege of doing business within the state. The privilege tax is in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The tax is paid to the State for the privilege of doing business within the state according to, or measured by, the privilege taxpayer’s net income for the next preceding year.

K.S.A. 79-1106 (Ensley 1984) provides:

“It is hereby declared to be the intention of the legislature to levy a tax on national banking associations, banks, trust companies, and savings and loan associations, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of Kansas v. SessionsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Palmer v. State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Wilson v. First State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. First National Bank v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API