Legal Opinion

FW Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Dept. of NM

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 18, 1982No. 80-1745PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

The question is whether the Due Process Clause permits New Mexico to tax a portion of dividends that appellant F. W. Woolworth Co. received from foreign subsidiaries that do no business in New Mexico. We also must decide whether New Mexico may include within Woolworth’s apportionable New Mexico income a sum, commonly known as “gross-up,” that Woolworth calculated in order to claim a foreign tax credit on its federal income tax.

I

Woolworth’s principal place of business and commercial domicile are in New York. It engages in retail business through chains of stores located in the United States,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Hans Rees' Sons, Inc. v. North Carolina Ex Rel. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. NCR Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API