Legal Opinion

Boyd v. . Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Civil action, tried upon exception to referee’s report before Mclver, J., at August Term, 1892, of Rockingham Superior Court. The defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Burwell, J.:

This action was brought to recover of the defendant a sum of money alleged to be due from it on account of a policy of insurance issued on June 9,1887, to the firm of IT. Sampson & Co., the property covered by said policy having been destroyed by fire on November 7, 1887, as alleged in the complaint.

In the first section of his complaint the plaintiff says that he is “ receiver of H. Sampson & Co., composed of H. Sampson. E. E. Richardson and Cornelius Sampson, late partners doing business as such, under the name of IT. Sampson & Co., and appointed such receiver by order of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Winfree v. . BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Abrams v. . CuretonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. R. H. Battle v. . S.W. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  5. Berry Bros. v. Nelson Davis & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. ClaytorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Goodwin v. . ClaytorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Michalek v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. R. G. Chapman & Co. v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Martin v. . Mask.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API