Legal Opinion

State v. Breshears

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 1989No. 87061255 A47511 (CONTROL) & A47540PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*107NEWMAN, J.

In these consolidated appeals, defendants challenge their convictions for manufacturing a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. They contend that the court erred in denying their pretrial motions to suppress evidence seized in Breshears’ apartment during the execution of a search warrant. We reverse.

Breshears occupied a corner, groundfloor apartment, located in a building containing two apartments that was part of a multi-building complex. Oliver rented an apartment in a separate building in the complex.1 At 8:10 p.m. on June 14, 1987, Deputy Sheriff Struble went to Breshears’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. OhlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PortreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. GabbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. Hitesman/PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API