Greenwood v. Rickman
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM PU.TNAM. Appeal from the Chancery Conrt of Putnam County.— Hon. W. R. Officer, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall
The bill in this cause challenges the constitutionality of chapter 490 of the Private Acts of 1921, which act was later amended in a minor particular, which amendment is immaterial, and need not be further noticed in the determination of the questions presented upon this appeal.
*366This statute undertook to create a special school district in Putnam county; define its boundaries, and to levy a tax for school purposes on the property situated in said district, and to provide for the voting, issuance, and sale of bonds by said district, the proceeds of which were to be used in building a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Astor v. Schlitz Brewing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. YardleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Weight v. CunninghamTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Railroad v. CriderTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
- Quinn v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Knoxville Housing Authority, Inc. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
- House v. CrevelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Van Dyke v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Michael v. WithamTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.