Legal Opinion

Stamatiou v. United States Gypsum Company

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 16, 1975No. 73 C 3257PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

MARSHALL, District Judge.

Pending before the court for decision are cross-motions for summary judgment and the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the defendants’ counterclaim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Previously, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s four-count complaint, which was denied in a memorandum order dated November 1, 1974. That order set out the facts surrounding the plaintiff’s complaint and, therefore, no further delineation is necessary.

The Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

When a party presents a motion…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,524 Carl Mintz and Shirley Mintz v. Mathers Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thomas Palermo and Sheldon Saltzman v. Warden, Green Haven State Prison, and Russell OswaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Nelson v. McGoldrickWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sandra Boddie v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. Geraldo Rivera Charles C. Thompson and Maravilla Production Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Jamestown Farmers Elevator, Inc., Formerly Mutschler Grain Company v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Malatesta v. LeichterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API