Cameron v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Tbe chief purpose of this action is to enjoin the defendants from building a highway between Durham and Oxford via Creed-moor. Between these termini there is a public road which passes through the town of Stem, and is now, and for about three years has been, under the control of the State Highway Commission. The former is referred to in the record as the Creedmoor route, and the latter as the Stem route. In 1923 the plaintiffs and others filed with the commissioner of the Fourth District a petition that the Stem route be laid with a hard surface, and in pursuance of such request the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hyatt v. Dehart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Jones v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Mayo v. Commissioners of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- School Committee of Seventy-First Consolidated School District v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Lee v. Town of WaynesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Styers v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State Highway Commission v. Greensboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Causey v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Western Carolina Power Co. v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.