Legal Opinion

Graham v. Pactiv Corp. Benefits Committee

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 22, 2004No. CIV.A. 3:03CV169PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAYNE, District Judge.

On February 19, 2003, David Graham (“Graham”) filed this action against defendants Pactiv Retirement Plan, Plan No. 031 (the “Pactiv Plan”) and the Pactiv Corporation Benefits Committee (the “Pactiv Benefits Committee”), seeking redress for several alleged violations of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. The Pactiv Plan is a detailed employee benefits plan governed by ERISA. The Pactiv Plan is funded by the employees of various companies, including the Packaging Corporation of America (“PCA”) which…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH SHERIFF'S OFFICEDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  2. Brown v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  3. Cuffee v. Tidewater Community CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  4. White v. Nicholas L. Potocska, P.C.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  5. Puckett v. City of PortsmouthDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API