Legal Opinion

Edwards v. County of San Diego

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2005No. 03-55832PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff-Appellant Tamye Edwards appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment and the dismissal of her suit with prejudice. As Edwards’s counsel conceded at oral argument, only one of the myriad of claims raised in her brief has merit: whether the First Amended Complaint sufficiently raised a claim under the California Constitution.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) states that a complaint only requires a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” This court has repeatedly held that “ ‘[a] party need not plead specific…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Broam v. BoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. American Timber & Trading Co. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Holley v. CrankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCabe v. MacAulayDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
  2. Goings v. Chickasaw County, IADistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
  3. Shine v. FustonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API