Legal Opinion
Poulin v. the Thomas Agency
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 13, 2011No. 09-cv-575-GZSPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 36) filed by Defendant The Thomas Agency. As explained herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
Generally, a party is entitled to summary judgment if, on the record before the Court, it appears “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)(2). “[T]he mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Carmen Nereida-Gonzalez v. Cirilo Tirado-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Triangle Trading Co. v. Robroy Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Wittenberg v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2012
- Martel v. LVNV Funding, LLC (In re Martel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2015
- LeDoux v. JP Morgan Chase N.A., et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
- Pasley v. Biggs (In re Pasley)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.