Pasley v. Biggs (In re Pasley)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
D. Statute of Limitations
The Court will next turn to the statute of limitations defense. As mentioned above, the Defendants argue that the state law claims asserted by the Plaintiff should be dismissed because this action was not timely commenced. Specifically, because the summons and complaint were not served within the limitations period, the Defendants argue the claims must be dismissed.4 The Defendants cite KRS 413.140(1)(a) and (d) and 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d) in support of their argument. Here, because the Judgment Lien was recorded on December 15, 2016, pursuant to KRS 413.140(1)(a) and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kevin Miller v. McCalla Raymer, Padrick, Cobb, Nichols, and Clark, L.L.C., and Echevarria, McCalla Raymer, Barrett, and FrappierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Fred G. Staub and Yvonne G. Staub v. G. H. Harris, James P. Harris, and G. H. Harris AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Robert D. Slenk Chris Slenk v. Trans World Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Krasnor v. Spaulding Law OfficeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Poulin v. the Thomas AgencyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Burton v. Kohn Law Firm, S.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- John Burton v. Kohn Law Firm, S.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Lewis v. Sole Law, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Ripa v. PerfettiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2020