Legal Opinion
State v. Wersebe
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 5, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.
This is a prosecution based upon P. L. 8683, which, so far as material here, provides that “a person who * * * promotes a lottery for money * * *, or disposes of money * * * by a lottery, and a person aiding * * * in so doing, shall be fined * * There were numerous counts in the information, but the respondent was only found guilty upon counts 2, 3, 7, and 8. These contained the usual allegations of time and place and the usual conclusion, and respectively charged as follows:
No. 2. That the respondent “did aid in the promotion of a lottery for money by to wit paying a certain sum of money, to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- O'Boyle v. Parker-Young Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- State v. StorrsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- State v. CaplanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BarilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- State v. GosselinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- State v. Van NessSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.