Legal Opinion
State v. Storrs
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.
Having been convicted of a violation of section 87, No. 70, Acts 1925, providing that “A person shall not operate or attempt to operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquors, * * * *” the respondent has brought the case to this Court on exceptions.
By exceptions to the denial of a motion for a directed verdict, to the refusal to charge as requested and to the charge as given, the contention is advanced that since the mechanism of the automobile was so far broken down that the engine, to the respond ent’s certain knowledge, could not be set in motion, tbe respondent…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Whipple v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
- State v. TaceySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Robinson v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Mercer v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- State v. CarmodySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.