Legal Opinion

Haggerty v. Red Bank Borough Zoning Board of Adjustment

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 22, 2006PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEISSBARD, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, landowners in the Borough of Red Bank (Borough), appeal from the dismissal of their complaint in lieu of prerogative writs challenging decisions of defendant, Red Bank Borough Zon*504ing Board of Adjustment (Board), granting the bifurcated application of Building and Land Technology (BLT) for a “d” /density variance, and thereafter for bulk variances and site plan approval to construct condominiums and townhouses. Because of an impermissible conflict of interest on the part of the Board’s presiding officer, we reverse and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Wyzykowski v. RizasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Griggs v. Borough of PrincetonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Pyatt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of DunellenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Piscitelli v. City of Jr.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  4. KANE PROPERTIES v. HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  5. Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API