People v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From verdicts of guilty on two counts of forcible rape after trial before a jury defendants appeal. There is also an appeal from an order denying their motions for a new trial.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent) and pursuant to the rules set forth in People v. Pianezzi, 42 Cal.App.2d 265 [108 P.2d 732], the essential facts are:
At about 8:30 p. m. on September 12, 1946, the prosecuting witness, a widow 56 years of age, left her home in Long Beach in company with her nephew and walked several blocks to the ocean front. She had been having some…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. HeadleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. BalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. CasillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Hanley v. LundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. BodkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951