State v. Houghton
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. Charles Houghton appeals from a second conviction of robbery.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
*111The defendant was tried in December, 1902, on an information charging him with the crime of robbery, and convicted of “assault with intent to rob.” Upon appeal the judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered: State v. Houghton, 43 Or. 125 (71 Pac. 982). He was again tried on the same information,'found “guilty as charged,” and sentenced to a term in the penitentiary. From this judgment he also appeals.
1. After the appeal had been taken, it was discovered that the judgment of this court directing a new trial had not been remitted to'tlie court below prior to the second trial, and it is now…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- State v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . DohringNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- State v. FinchOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Levin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- In re HallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.