Legal Opinion
Levin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1925No. 4310PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The imposition of sentences on the second counts of the indictments is assigned as error for the reason that the defendants had already been convicted on the first counts, and in those counts the transactions embraced the identical transactions set out in the second counts. There was no demurrer to the joinder of the two counts in either of the indictments, and no demand was made that the government elect that on which it would prosecute. No objection was made to the instructions by which both counts were submitted to the jury. The question now presented…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Schino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Steinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- People v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.