Legal Opinion

Sucker State Drill Co. v. Brock

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1908PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from- District Court. Action by the Sucker State Drill Company against R. J. Brock and R. L. Richardson. Judgment for defendant, -and plaintiff appeals. Leave to amend should be granted. Rev. -Codes 1905, Sec. 7224; Tollerton v. Casperson, 63 N. W. 908; Skinner v. Holt, 69 N. W. 59-5. Appeal' cannot be taken from two; separate orders.

Read the full summary

Appeal from- District Court. Action by the Sucker State Drill Company against R. J. Brock and R. L. Richardson. Judgment for defendant, -and plaintiff appeals. Leave to amend should be granted. Rev. -Codes 1905, Sec. 7224; Tollerton v. Casperson, 63 N. W. 908; Skinner v. Holt, 69 N. W. 59-5. Appeal' cannot be taken from two; separate orders. Ewing & Harseh v. Lunn, 109 M. 1W, 642; Prodzinski v. Garbutt, 9 N. D. '23-9, 8'3 N. W. 23. One undertaking is insufficient where there is one appeal from a judgment and another from an order. Corcoran v. Desmond, 11 Pac. 815; Carter v. Butte etc. 63 Pac.…

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.

(This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The notice of appeal is as follows: “Please take notice that the * * * plaintiff appeals to the Supreme Court * * * from the judgment of .said district court, entered (herein on the 19th day of December, 1906, and also from the order of said court entered herein on November 5, 1907, overruling 'plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, and the order of said court entered herein dated November 30, 1907, overruling the motion of plaintiff for a new trial herein, and from the whole thereof.” . The ground urged in favor of the motion to dismiss is that the appeal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Skinner v. HoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kinney v. Brotherhood of American YeomenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hawkins v. HubbardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Anderson v. HultmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hackett v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of FrankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. McLean v. UnderdalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Shockman v. RuthruffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Beyer v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Fargo Silo Co. v. Pioneer Stock Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API