Legal Opinion

Hackett v. Gunderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1891PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from district and circuit courts, Jerauld county. Motion to dismiss appeal on the ground of duplicity. Allowed.

1Opinion of the CourtKellam, J.

This case was originally tried in the district court for , Jerauld county, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant moved to set aside the verdict on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence, and for a new trial. This motion •was denied by the court, February 23, 1889, Hon. Bartlett Tripp, Judge. Afterwards, defendant moved the circuit court, as the successor of said district court, no judgment having been, entered on said verdict, as appears by the record, to set aside said verdict, and for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, which motion was also denied by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Button-Hole, Overseaming & Sewing Machine Co. v. GurneeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Ballou v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kinney v. Brotherhood of American YeomenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Prondzinski v. GarbuttNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Ewing v. LunnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API