Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Hultman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1899PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Brule county. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Defendant appeals from an order refusing to vacate an attachment and an order denying a motion to vacate and set aside the summons. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This purports to be au appeal from two orders, — one made on the 11th day of July, 1898, refusing to vacate an attachment, and the secoud made on the 13th day of August, 1898, denying the motiou to vacate and set aside the summons in the said action. The statement in the abstract of the notice of appeal is as follows: “On the 28th day of August, 1898, the appellant served notice of appeal from the said orders, and the whole of both of them, upon plaintiff’s attorneys and the clerk of said court, and upon the same day perfected his appeal from said orders, and the whole of both of *107them, by…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kinney v. Brotherhood of American YeomenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Prondzinski v. GarbuttNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Morrison & Skaug v. ConnerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gordon v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Grieves v. DanaherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API