Legal Opinion

Curdy v. Berton

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1889No. 11949PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

Madeline Curdy died February 9, 1877, in Alameda County, California. She left a will duly executed, in which, after bequests to several persons, including the plaintiff herein, there occurs the following: “I give in trust to Francis Berton, now Swiss consul in San Francisco, all the moneys I possess in France, and principally my share of the Italian rentes, deposited in the banking-house of Messrs. Hentsch, Lutscher, & Co., of Paris, to be distributed according to the private instructions I give him.” Berton was present when the will was made, and wrote it for the testatrix at her request;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Matter of Will of O'HaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Williams v. . FitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Olliffe v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Brown v. LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1828

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Ludington v. PattonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Reynolds v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API