Legal Opinion

Baird v. Unum Group

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 15, 2012No. Case No. 2:11-cv-634PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TERENCE P. KEMP, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs Joy and Jack Baird filed this ERISA-based action after Joy’s workplace insurer, Unum, terminated long-term disability benefits which had been awarded to her in 1994. Unum also told Joy that she should only have received benefits for two years and that it had overpaid her to the tune of some $180,000.00. She has exhausted her administrative remedies. In this case, she seeks reinstatement of her benefits, an award of past due benefit payments, and a finding that she is eligible to keep getting benefits until she turns…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Mary Moore Hoover v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Murphy v. Wal-Mart Associates' Group Health PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1996
  5. Tavares v. Unum Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  2. McCulloch v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API