Murphy v. Wal-Mart Associates' Group Health Plan
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEARTFIELD, District Judge.
Before the court is Wal-Mart Associates’ Group Health Plan’s (Wal-Mart Plan) Motion for Summary Judgment [33] and Prudential Health Care Plan’s (Prudential) Motion for Summary Judgment [64], Wal-Mart Plan moves for summary judgment on the ground that the Plan did not act in an arbitrary and capricious manner in denying plaintiffs’ benefits and subsequent appeal. Prudential, a claims administrator to the Plan, moves for summary judgment on the ground that it can not be held liable to plaintiffs’ under the ERISA statute. For the reasons stated in the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Florence B. Corcoran Wife Of/and Wayne D. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc., and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blum v. Spectrum Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
- Constantine v. American Airlines Pension Benefit PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
- Electrostim Medical Services, Inc. v. Health Care Service Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Engle v. Wal-Mart Associates Health & Welfare PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.