Legal Opinion

McCulloch v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 15, 2022No. 3:19-cv-07716Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KRISTIN E. MCCULLOCH, Case No. 19-cv-07716-SI 9 Plaintiff, OPINION AND MEMORANDUM OF 10 v. DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S ERISA SECTION 1132(A)(1)(B) ACTION TO 11 HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT CLARIFY RIGHTS TO BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Kristin McCulloch initiated this ERISA action after she was denied benefits under an 15 employer-sponsored long-term disability group plan (“LTD Policy”) administered by Hartford 16 Insurance. The Court previously determined McCulloch qualified as disabled from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Iragorri v. International Elevator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Daniel Kunin v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Muniz v. Amec Construction Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API