Atlanta, Birmingham Coast R. Co. v. Cary
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
The suit is under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., and that it was properly so brought and the cause of action correctly stated in the count upon which the case was submitted to the jury, does not appear to be here questioned.
There was judgment for the plaintiff, from which defendant prosecutes this appeal. Motion for a new trial was overruled.
The entire argument of appellant is rested upon the theory of an insufficiency of the evidence to make out a case for submission to the jury, and the refusal of the affirmative charge duly requested…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Louisville & N. R. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Reynolds v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Ellerbee v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Central of Georgia Railway Company v. SteedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.